The FHA Modernization Act includes a provision where the seller or interested third parties cannot participate in a down payment assistance programs unless the borrower’s loan application is final approved prior to October 1st. Our government Lending leaders met with HUD this afternoon and FHA has confirmed the definition of "borrower approved" (loans would need to be input by Sept 5 to get approval by Sept 30.)
3)Tax credits for First Time Homebuyers:
H.R. 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 — which has just been passed by the Congress and now is on its way to President Bush for his signature — allows first-time home buyers to take a $7,500 tax credit from the purchase of a single-family home, townhome or condominium apartment.
Any home buyer who has not owned a home during the past three years and is a U.S. citizen who files taxes is eligible to participate in this program. (Some home buyers who are not citizens may also qualify; see #14 in the questions and answers below.)
To qualify, buyers must actually close on the sale of the home on or after April 9, 2008 and before July 1, 2009. The original eligibility period expired in April 2009, but following a major grassroots campaign from NAHB members, the period was extended to enable home builders to include the credit in their sales and marketing next spring and into the early summer — the peak home buying season.
The program does have income limits. Single or head-of-household filers can claim the full $7,500 credit if their adjusted gross income (AGI) is less than $75,000. For married couples filing a joint return, the income limit doubles to $150,000.
Single or head-of-household taxpayers who earn between $75,000 and $95,000 are eligible to receive a partial first-time home buyer tax credit. The same applies to married couples who earn between $150,000 and $170,000.
The credit is not available for single taxpayers whose AGI is greater than $95,000 and married couples with an AGI exceeding $170,000.
A refundable credit means that if a taxpayer pays less than $7,500 in federal income taxes, the government will write them a check for the difference. For example, if $5,000 in federal taxes is owed, the taxpayer would pay nothing and a $2,500 payment would be received from the IRS. If a qualifying home buyer were owed a $1,000 tax refund, they would receive $8,750.
Buyers can take the tax credit on their 2008 or 2009 tax return. Those who close in 2008 take the credit on their 2008 return. Buyers in 2009 have the option of taking the credit on their 2008 or 2009 returns.
The tax-credit program also has payback provisions.
The credit essentially serves as an interest-free loan to be repaid over 15 years. For example, a home buyer claiming a $7,500 credit would repay the credit at $500 per year. If the home owner sold the home, then the remaining credit would be due from the profit of the home sale.
If there is insufficient profit, then the remaining credit payback would be forgiven.
Paula New Mortgage Loan OfficerBank of America Mortgage
By Kenneth R. HarneySaturday, July 19, 2008; F01
After six months of haggling and political gamesmanship, a massive housing relief bill is heading for final approval.
Although it has hundreds of pages and contains dozens of initiatives, including revamping federal oversight of the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the centerpiece is a $300 billion program, called Hope for Homeowners, designed to provide refinancing lifelines to as many as 400,000 homeowners in deep trouble on their loans.
But what are the specifics? Who would be able to qualify for help? How quickly would Hope be up and running, and how long would it run? Are there any key drawbacks or limitations?
Congress's basic idea is to save people on the edge of the waterfall: families and individuals at immediate risk of losing their homes but who could avoid foreclosure if their mortgage balances and interest rates were significantly reduced.
The program would be entirely voluntary -- and that's a crucial limitation. Lenders and investors who own defaulting mortgages would not be compelled to let their borrowers refinance. If they conclude that they're likely to lose less by allowing delinquent borrowers to go to foreclosure rather than refinance into Hope loans, they would be free to do so, even if their borrowers qualify and want to participate.
Lenders would have to agree to substantially write down principal and penalty fees. The new maximum Hope loan amount -- insured by the Federal Housing Administration under a special fund created by the legislation -- would be 90 percent of the current market value of the property, not the value of the house when the lender originally made the loan.
Plus, the FHA would impose an upfront insurance fee of 3 percent of the new loan amount, payable out of refinancing proceeds that would otherwise go to the original lender. Lenders would also have to clear away any potential issues with holders of second liens on properties -- typically banks that have extended equity credit lines or second mortgages and have a claim on any refinancing proceeds -- before participating in the Hope plan.
There are important hurdles borrowers must get over to qualify, as well. They must:
· Demonstrate a "lack of capacity" to pay their current mortgage but have enough income to make regular monthly payments on a smaller, fixed-rate FHA loan. Their mortgage-debt-to-income ratio must be above 35 percent.
· Certify to the government that they haven't "intentionally defaulted" on their current mortgage or any other debt in order to refinance into a Hope loan. They must also certify that they are telling the truth about all aspects of their financial status and have never been convicted of fraud. Anyone who lies on the application will be subject to severe penalties, including a prison sentence of up to five years.
· Agree to use and occupy the refinanced house as a principal residence and not own any other homes.
An important and somewhat unusual feature of the program is the federal government's requirement that homeowner beneficiaries share any appreciation profits or equity gains from the sale of the house in subsequent years. The message here is that Hope is no free ride. The refinancing process itself would essentially create new equity stakes for borrowers because the maximum loan amount would be 90 percent of the appraised market value of the property.
Borrowers who had been underwater and in serious default would suddenly find themselves with 10 percent equity stakes overnight, but they won't be able to tap that money quickly. If the home is sold within the first year after the refinancing, the FHA must be repaid the equity created in full. In sales during the next four years, homeowners can retain rising percentages of the equity, up to 50 percent. In addition, the FHA will be entitled to 50 percent of any appreciation in market value from the date of refinancing to a subsequent sale.
Under the legislation, the Hope program could start as early as Oct. 1, but it must terminate on Sept. 30, 2011. The unanswerable questions hovering over the entire Hope concept: Will enough lenders and investors agree to take the upfront losses -- they call them "haircuts" -- required to participate? Congressional estimates suggest that up to 400,000 financially distressed borrowers could be assisted, but nobody knows for sure.
Also, will lenders send only the dregs of their portfolios -- borrowers with the least likelihood of future success -- to the FHA? And if so, could the program end up being far more costly than Congress anticipated, even with a $300 billion authorization to cover insurance losses?
Announcement 08-16 June 25, 2008
Amends these Guides: Selling
Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, and Conversion of Principal Residence Policy Changes; and Revised Property Value Representation and Warranty Requirements
Introduction
With this Announcement, Fannie Mae is introducing several new and updated policies that pertain to the following topics:
• Bankruptcy and foreclosure policies: updates to manual underwriting requirements for borrowers with prior bankruptcy or foreclosure actions in their credit history, including deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure and preforeclosure sales,
• Conversion of principal residence to second home or investment property: new requirements for borrowers who are purchasing a new principal residence, and intend to convert their existing principal residence to a second home or investment property, and
• Representation and warranty requirements: revised property value representation and warranty requirements for mortgage loans that are closed more than 6 months up to 12 months prior to the date the loan is sold to Fannie Mae.
The effective dates for each of the above updates are outlined at the end of this Announcement.
Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Policy Changes
Selling Guide, Part X, Section 302.10, Prior Bankruptcy or Foreclosure; and Section 803.02, Payment History
Announcement 08-08, Mortgage Eligibility and Pricing Updates for Desktop Underwriter® and Manually Underwritten Loans, dated March 31, 2008, outlined changes to the requirements for borrowers with a prior foreclosure in their credit history. With this Announcement 08-16, Fannie Mae is updating the requirements regarding the time period that must elapse before borrowers can demonstrate they have reestablished their credit history after the occurrence of a bankruptcy or foreclosure. The updates pertain to the following policies.
Updating the requirements for bankruptcy actions to apply from the discharge or dismissal date, whichever is applicable, and requiring a longer elapsed time period for Chapter 13 bankruptcies that were dismissed. For all bankruptcy actions, the elapsed time period to reestablish credit will now be measured from the bankruptcy discharge or dismissal date. For all bankruptcy cases, other than Chapter 13 cases, the time period to reestablish credit remains at 4 years. For Chapter 13 cases, a distinction is being made between Chapter 13 bankruptcies that were discharged and those that were dismissed. The updated policy recognizes the fact that borrowers have reestablished credit through the successful completion of a Chapter 13 plan and subsequent discharge by requiring only a 2-year time period to elapse. A borrower who was unable to complete the Chapter 13 plan and received a dismissal, however, will be held to a 4-year time period for reestablishing credit.
Establishing a new policy for borrowers who have more than one bankruptcy filing in the past 7-year time period. A 5-year elapsed time period is now required to reestablish credit from the most recent discharge or dismissal date for borrowers who have more than one bankruptcy filing in the past 7 years. The presence of multiple bankruptcies in the borrower’s credit history is evidence of significant derogatory credit and increases the likelihood of future default. The greater the number of such incidences and the more recently they occurred, the higher the credit risk.
Establishing a new policy for preforeclosure sales. A preforeclosure sale involves the sale of the property by the borrower to a third party for less than the amount owed to satisfy the delinquent mortgage, as agreed to by the lender, investor, and mortgage insurer. Due to the increased incidence of preforeclosure sales, Fannie Mae is establishing a 2-year elapsed time period for reestablishing credit following completion of the action.
The following table outlines Fannie Mae’s current and new policies for manually underwritten loans related to the time period that must elapse before borrowers can demonstrate they have reestablished an acceptable credit history after the occurrence of the bankruptcy or foreclosure. The table also includes new “Additional requirements” that apply to foreclosures.
Action
Current Requirements
New Requirements
Bankruptcy (All Except Chapter 13)
4-year time period from discharge date
The 4-year time period remains the same but will now be applied from either the discharge or dismissal date of the bankruptcy action.
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
2-year time period from discharge date
The time period for Chapter 13 bankruptcy actions is measured as follows:
• 2 years from the discharge date, or
• 4 years from the dismissal date.
Exceptions for Extenuating Circumstances – All Bankruptcy Actions
2-year time period from discharge date. No exception to the 2 year time period for Chapter 13 bankruptcy actions.
The 2-year time period will be measured from the bankruptcy discharge or dismissal date. No exceptions are permitted to the 2-year time period after a Chapter 13 discharge.
Multiple Bankruptcy Filings
No existing policy
5-year time period from most recent dismissal or discharge date required for borrowers with more than one bankruptcy filing within the past 7 years.
Exceptions for Extenuating Circumstances – Multiple Bankruptcy Filings
3-year time period from the most recent discharge or dismissal date
Note: The most recent bankruptcy filing must have been the result of extenuating circumstances.
Foreclosure1
4-year time period from the date the foreclosure sale was completed (“completion date”)
5-year time period from completion date
Additional requirements that apply after 5 years up to 7 years following completion date:
• The purchase of a principal residence is permitted with a minimum 10 percent down payment and minimum representative credit score of 680.
• Purchase of a second home or investment property is not permitted.
• Limited cash-out refinances are permitted for all occupancy types pursuant to the eligibility requirements in effect at that time.
• Cash-out refinances are not permitted for any occupancy type.
1 The “New Requirements” were previously announced in Announcement 08-08, but additional clarification is provided here.
Exceptions for Extenuating Circumstances –
2-year time period from completion date
3-year time period from completion date
Additional requirements that apply after 3 years up to 7 years following completion date:
The same additional requirements apply as above except the minimum credit score of 680 is not required.
Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure
4-year time period from completion date (date deed-in-lieu executed)
No change
Additional requirements that apply after 4 years up to 7 years following completion date:
• Borrower may purchase a property secured by a principal residence, second home, or investment property with the greater of 10 percent minimum down payment or the minimum down payment required for the transaction.
• Limited-cash-out and cash-out refinance transactions secured by a principal residence, second home, or investment property are permitted pursuant to the eligibility requirements in effect at that time.
The same additional requirements noted above for deed-in-lieu apply after 2 years up to 7 years following completion date.
Time Period After Preforeclosure Sale
2-year time period from completion date.
Additional Requirements: None
Note: No exceptions are permitted to the 2-year time period due to extenuating circumstances.
Note: The Selling Guide, Part X, Section 803.02 contains several requirements the lender must follow in order to determine that the borrower has successfully reestablished his or her credit history after a bankruptcy or foreclosure action. These requirements continue to be applicable, in addition to the elapsed time periods and any additional requirements noted above. Additionally, Desktop Underwriter (DU®) will be updated in a future release to incorporate some or all of the policy changes noted above.
Conversion of Principal Residence to Second Home or Investment Property
Selling Guide, Part X, Section 402.24 Rental Income, and Section 702.03 All Other Liabilities, D. Payments on real estate mortgages
Borrowers who currently own their home typically have three options when they decide to purchase a new principal residence. They can
• sell the current residence and pay off the outstanding mortgage,
• convert the property to a second home, assuming they can qualify with both the existing and new mortgage payments, or
• convert the property to an investment property and provide documentation that they will rent the property and use the income to offset the mortgage payment.
In order to ensure that borrowers have sufficient equity and/or reserves to support both the existing financing and the new mortgage being originated, Fannie Mae is updating the policies for qualifying borrowers purchasing a new principal residence and converting their existing principal residence to a second home or investment property.
• Rental income that will be generated from the prior principal residence is based solely on a fully executed lease agreement for that property provided by the borrower (now landlord).
• If the lender uses current lease agreements, the net rental income will be 75 percent of the gross rent from the lease agreement, with the remaining 25 percent being absorbed by vacancy losses and ongoing maintenance expenses.
• Minimum reserves are required for investment properties: 2 months for one-unit properties, and 6 months reserves for two- to four-unit properties. Minimum reserves are not required for second home transactions.
Current principal residence is pending sale but the transaction will not be closed (with title transfer to a new owner) prior to the new transaction
Both the current and the proposed mortgage payments must be used to qualify the borrower for the new transaction.
Conversion to a Second Home
• Both the current and the proposed mortgage payments must be used to qualify the borrower for the new transaction; and
• 6 months of PITI for both properties is required to be in reserves. Lender may consider reduced reserves of no less than 2 months for both properties if there is documented equity of at least 30 percent in the existing property (derived from an appraisal, automated valuation model (AVM), or Broker Price Opinion (BPO), minus outstanding liens)
Conversion to an Investment Property
Fannie Mae will continue to permit up to 75 percent of the rental income to be used to offset the mortgage payment in qualifying if there is documented equity of at least 30 percent in the existing property (derived from an appraisal, AVM, or BPO, minus outstanding liens).
The rental income must be documented with:
• a copy of the fully executed lease agreement; and
• the receipt of a security deposit from the tenant and deposit into the borrower’s account.
If the 30 percent equity in the property cannot be documented, rental income may not be used to offset the mortgage payment.
Both the current and the proposed mortgage payments must be used to qualify the borrower for the new transaction; and
6 months of PITI for both properties is required to be in reserves.
These guidelines are applicable to manually underwritten loans and, except for the additional reserve requirements, must also be applied (on a manual basis) to loan casefiles underwritten with DU. DU will determine the level of reserves for each loan casefile.
Revised Property Value Representation and Warranty
Selling Guide, Part 1, Section 202.01 Additional Selling Warranties, C. Product-specific warranties
Fannie Mae has conducted a review of the standard Selling Guide representations and warranties applicable to the value of the subject property. Under Fannie Mae’s existing requirements, lenders must represent and warrant that the current value of a property is not less than the original property value for loans that are closed more than 12 months prior to the date the loan is sold to Fannie Mae. With this Announcement, Fannie Mae is expanding the coverage of the existing representation and warranty related to property value to now include mortgage loans that are closed more than 6 months up to 12 months prior to the date the loan is sold to Fannie Mae. In addition, if the lender is unable to provide the new representation and warranty, Fannie Mae is specifying the method by which the loans must be delivered.
The following table describes the required property value representation and warranty requirements.
Age from Loan Closing Date to Sale Date
Required Representation and Warranty
More than 6 months and up to and including 12 months
Lender must warrant that the current value of the property is not less than the original value.
More than 12 months
The lender must continue to provide the representations and warranties outlined in the Selling Guide, Part I, Section 202.01.C, Additional Selling Warranties and Part VII, Section 104.02 Mortgage Seasoning.
Note: For all mortgages, the lender makes the standard Selling Guide warranties related to the original appraisal obtained in connection with the origination of the mortgage, including the accuracy of the appraised value, and its assessment of the marketability of the security property. Fannie Mae is not making any changes to the requirements for the age of the appraisal (the interval between the date of the appraisal and the loan closing date) as outlined in the Selling Guide, Part XI, Section 201, Age of Appraisal (or Property Inspection).
Required Delivery Method if Lender is Unable to Provide Value Warranty
For loans that are aged more than 6 months from the closing date to the date the loan is sold to Fannie Mae, if the lender is unable to warrant that the current value of the property is not less than the original value of the property, the loan is not eligible for delivery to Fannie Mae by the lender as flow business. In these instances, the loan must be submitted for delivery as part of a bulk transaction. Bulk transactions will be subject to additional review by Fannie Mae to ensure the loan is eligible for sale, including compliance with maximum loan-to-value ratios and mortgage insurance requirements, and to ensure that the loan is appropriately priced.
Regardless of delivery method, lenders continue to be responsible for standard Selling Guide warranties related to the original appraisal, including accuracy of the appraisal and marketability of the property at time of loan origination. For purposes of determining lenders’ compliance with these warranties, Fannie Mae may take such steps as it deems appropriate to validate the origination value, including the use of a retrospective property appraisal.
Effective Dates
The changes in this Announcement are effective as follows:
Topic
Effective Date
Bankruptcy and foreclosure policies
Loan applications dated on or after
August 1, 2008
Conversion of principal residence policies
Revised property value representation and warranty (and delivery requirements)
Whole loans purchased or MBS pools with issue dates on or after August 1, 2008
Michael A. Quinn Senior Vice President
Single-Family Risk Officer
The term "mortgage meltdown" has become so common -- on TV, in headlines and in casual conversations -- that you might assume that this is a tough time to get a mortgage.
But the reality is starkly different: Mortgage money is plentiful; the majority of mortgage products remain relatively unaffected by troubles in the subprime segment; and interest rates for 30-year, fixed-rate loans remain in the low 6 percent range for people with reasonably good -- not necessarily perfect -- credit records.
Even interest rates on jumbo loans -- those for more than $417,000 -- have fallen after spiking this summer.
The main change over the past several months is that "the products and underwriting that allowed people to buy houses they couldn't afford have disappeared," said Ted Grose, president of 1st Mortgage Advisors in Los Angeles.
Nonetheless, lenders and brokers say, there is a widespread and persistent belief by consumers that the entire mortgage market is in crisis.
Kit Crowne, a loan officer with Right Trac Financial Group in Manchester, Conn., said even sophisticated homeowners with high incomes are under this impression. He recently handled a relocation financing for a professional couple moving from New Jersey to Connecticut. During the initial discussion, according to Crowne, one spouse said: "I'm really not sure that we're going to be able to even qualify for a mortgage. We've got a lot of graduate and dental school loan debt -- and I hear it's a terrible time in the mortgage market."
Crowne checked the couple's credit and verified assets and put them into a cream-puff fixed-rate first mortgage at 6.25 percent for 30 years. "You'd be amazed," he said, "at how often we run into this" pessimism -- even though rates are lower than they were midsummer.
Jumbo mortgages, which always have carried higher rates than "conforming" loans, or loans eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have recently been in the low 7 percent range, according to Crowne, down from 8 percent and higher a couple of months ago.
In Everett, Wash., Jim Brown, chief executive of Veteran Mortgage, agreed that "the 'mortgage meltdown' idea is way overstated." Even in his part of the country, where home prices are rising, "a lot of people think that the mortgage market is in much worse shape" than it actually is.
"Other than subprime and high-LTV [loan-to-value ratio] stated-income" programs, he said, "we've got pretty much everything now that we did before. We've got a lot of outlets." For example, Brown's company offers buyers with limited resources five loan programs that allow zero down payments and fixed rates of 6 percent to 6.25 percent.
Most lenders and investors are quick to note that, while mortgage money is plentiful, underwriting standards are more strict than they were a year ago. Jumbo loans, for example, often require two appraisals -- one by an appraiser selected by the lender and the other by one working for the investor.
"And they better line up," Crowne said, or they won't do the deal.
Similarly, FICO credit-score standards generally are higher than a year ago, stated-income mortgages with no verifications are hard to find and major investors are on the prowl for anything hinting at fraud. Lenders and investors are especially wary of excessive "layering of risk" -- combining low down payments with marginal credit scores and high debt-to-income ratios -- in markets where prices are trending lower.
A major legislative development underway on Capitol Hill could expand consumers' range of mortgage choices even further: Congress appears to be on the verge of transforming the once-stodgy Federal Housing Administration program into a competitive home loan option nationwide, with lower minimum down payments and maximum mortgage amounts generous enough to fund loans in pricey California.
Under a bill passed by the House on Sept. 18, FHA loans could go as high as 125 percent of an area's median home price or 175 percent of the limit for loans purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In California, where the statewide median price is in the mid-$500,000s, that could mean FHA-insured mortgages above $600,000. A companion bill approved by the Senate Banking Committee would cap FHA loans at the Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac limit, currently $417,000.
A key strength of the FHA that many borrowers may not know about is that its funding base is practically bulletproof: Its mortgages are pooled into federally guaranteed bonds issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) and are considered nearly as safe as Treasury securities.
Better yet, FHA loans are consumer-friendly -- no prepayment penalties, flexible and generous for consumers with past credit challenges -- but old-fashioned and strict about documenting income and assets.
Kyle Texas Real Estate | New Braunfels Real Estate | Buda Texas Real Estate | Wimberley TX Real Estate | Buying HUD Homes | Professional Educators Home Loan Program | Firefighter Home Loan Program | Law Enforcement Home Loan Program | San Marcos TX Real Estate | Kiddie Condo Program | Get Pre-qualified | Our Featured Homes | Search Central Area Homes | Search San Antonio Area Homes | My Blog | Foreclosure Listings
Copyright © 2012 ERA Millennium Realty The All Texas Realty TeamPortions Copyright © 2012 a la mode, inc.Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin Login| Terms of Use| Site MapAll rate, payment, and area information are estimates and approximations only.